(18.218.38.125)
Users online: 7830     
Ijournet
Email id
 

Year : 2023, Volume : 85, Issue : 4
First page : ( 1035) Last page : ( 1038)
Print ISSN : 0367-8288. Online ISSN : 0974-8172. Published online : 2023 December 04.
Article DOI : 10.55446/IJE.2022.160

Evaluation of IPM Modules against Diaphania caesalis (Walker) in Jack Fruit

Soumya K1, Krishnamoorthy A, Venkatesha M G2,*

Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Hesseraghatta Lake post, Bangalore560089, Karnakata, India

1Jyoti Nivas College Autonomous, Bengaluru560095, Karnakata, India

2Department of Zoology, Bangalore University, Bengaluru560056, Karnakata, India

*Email: venkatmelally@gmail.com (corresponding author)

Online Published on 04 January, 2024.

Received:  May,  2021; :  September,  2021; Accepted:  September,  2021; :  February,  2022.

Abstract

Field trials were conducted to evaluate four IPM modules against jack shoot and fruit borer Diaphania caesalis (Walker). Among different canopy types, the spreading type canopy was the most susceptible. The fruit damage on covered and hooked fruits were significantly lesser compared to control. Among the five modules evaluated- Module I (Nomuraea rileyi (WP)@ 10g/ l, pongamia soap 5 gm/ l, Trichogramma chilonis@ 45,000 adults and Apanteles stantoni@ 450 adults/ acre) were more effective. The laboratory mass multiplied parasitoids and pathogens provided an effective control. Moreover, ecofriendly botanical insecticides i.e. neem and pongamia are equally effective.

Top

Keywords

Jack fruit, Diaphania caesalis, Ecology, Biocontrol, Life history, Chemical control, Neem, Pongamia, Nomuraea rileyiTrichogramma chilonisApanteles stantoni, Hooking, Blagging.

Top

 
║ Site map ║ Privacy Policy ║ Copyright ║ Terms & Conditions ║ Page Rank Tool
744,391,586 visitor(s) since 30th May, 2005.
All rights reserved. Site designed and maintained by DIVA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD..
Note: Please use Internet Explorer (6.0 or above). Some functionalities may not work in other browsers.