(3.137.218.215)
Users online: 17010     
Ijournet
Email id
 

Year : 2023, Volume : 85, Issue : 4
First page : ( 1012) Last page : ( 1015)
Print ISSN : 0367-8288. Online ISSN : 0974-8172. Published online : 2023 December 04.
Article DOI : 10.55446/IJE.2021.353

Efficacy of Insecticides against Pod Borers of Indian Bean

Vaidik M Devashrayee1, Patel D R2,*, Sankhla P M2

1Department of Entomology, N M College of Agriculture, Navsari Agricultural University (NAU), Navsari396450, Gujarat, India

2Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture, NAU, Bharuch392012, Gujarat, India

*Email: patel.devendra2829@yahoo.com (corresponding author)

Online Published on 04 January, 2024.

Received:  June,  2021; :  December,  2021; Accepted:  December,  2021; :  March,  2022.

Abstract

Among the various insecticides evaluated for their field efficacy against pod borers of Indian bean, the treatment of emamectin benzoate 5SG at 0.002%, indoxacarb 14.5SC at 0.007% and lambdacyhalothrin 5SC at 0.005% were found to be most effective against Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) and Maruca vitrata Geyer. While, thiacloprid 21.7SC at 0.012% and novaluron 10EC at 0.01% were moderately effective. The least pod damage was observed with emamectin benzoate 5SG at 0.002% (13.16%) which was at par with indoxacarb 14.5SC at 0.007% (14.16%) and lambdacyhalothrin 5SC at 0.005% (16.33%). Maximum pod yield (21.75 q/ ha), increase in yield over control (95.76%) and % of avoidable loss (48.91%) was observed with emamectin benzoate 5SG at 0.002%.

Top

Keywords

Indian bean, Helicoverpa armigeraMaruca vitrata, emamectin benzoate, Indoxacarb, Lambda-cyhalothrin, Thiacloprid, Novaluron, Pod damage, Yield.

Top

 

Indian bean Lablab purpureus L. is a legume crop widely grown as vegetable or pulse crop. In Gujarat, this crop is mainly attacked by aphid Aphis craccivora Koch, leaf hopper Empoasca kerri Pruthi, whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius), thrips Megaleurothrips distalis Karny and pod borer Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Chaudhari et al., 2016). Of these, pod borers are most important regularly causing crop loss to the tune of 80-100% (Reddy et al., 2017), and thus a key impediment for productivity; nearly 54% loss occurs due to these in field beans. The major pod feeders include Maruca vitrata Geyer besides H. armigera. Many insecticides are effective against the pod borers of Indian bean, but resistance to common insecticides is known and it occurs due to its injudicious use. Therefore, this study to evaluate efficacy of some newer molecules.

Top

Materials and Methods

The field experiments on the evaluation of field efficacy of insecticides were conducted at the College Farm, N M College of Agriculture, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, Gujarat during 2019-20. The variety GNIB-22 was used with sowing done in plots of size 11 m2 at 60x 30 cm spacing. The crop was sown in the second fortnight of October. Nine treatments were evaluated along with untreated control, each replicated thrice. The insecticides i.e., thiamethoxam 25WG (1 g/ l), thiacloprid 21.7SC (0.6 ml/ l), buprofezin 25SC (2.0 ml/ l), acetamiprid 20SP (0.2 g/ l), indoxacarb 14.5SC (0.5 ml/ l), emamectin benzoate 5SG (0.4g/ l), lambdacyhalothrin 5SC (1ml/ l) and novaluron 10EC (1 ml/ l) were evaluated. These were applied as foliar spray using pre-calibrated knapsack sprayer when the pest incidence was sufficiently builtup. Second spray was repeated after 15 days of the first spray. The observations were recorded a day before spray as well as 1st, 3rd, 5th, 7th and 14th days after each spray, from 5 randomly selected plants/ plot. Number of H. armigera and M vitrata larvae were counted and mean was calculated. For recording observations on pod damage, total and damaged pods were counted at each picking. The yield of green pods was recorded plotwise during each picking, and plot-wise yield obtained was converted into kg ha-1. The data were subjected to statistical analysis.

Top

Results and Discussion

Results of pooled data over two years revealed that the significantly minimum incidence of H. armigera and M. vitrata larvae was recorded in plots treated with emamectin benzoate 5SG (1.54, 2.17 larvae/ plant) and it was at par with indoxacarb 14.5SC (1.60, 2.29 larvae/ plant) and lambdacyhalothrin 5SC (1.69, 2.36 larvae/ plant, respectively). Thiacloprid 21.7SC (2.57, 3.68 larvae/ plant) was the next effective and it was at par with novaluron 10EC (2.65, 3.78 larvae/ plant, respectively). Significantly minimum pod damage was recorded in the plots treated with emamectin benzoate 5SG (13.16%) which was at par with indoxacarb 14.5SC (14.16%) and lambdacyhalothrin 5SC (16.33%). The next effective treatments were thiacloprid 21.7SC (24.50%) and novaluron 10EC (27.83%). Maximum pod yield was obtained with emamectin benzoate 5SG (21.75 q/ ha) followed by indoxacarb 14.5SC (20.60 q/ ha) (Table 1, 2). Mohapatra and Srivastava (2002) observed that lambdacyhalothrin 5EC @ 25 g a.i./ ha was the most effective against M. vitrata in pigeon pea. Rao et al. (2007) showed that the indoxacarb 14.5SC @ 1 ml/ l was the most effective against M. vitrata in pigeonpea. Srinivasan and Durairaj (2007) found that spinosad 45SC @ 73 g a.i./ ha was the most effective against H. armigera followed by indoxacarb 14.8SC in pigeon pea. Babariya et al. (2010) with indoxacarb 0.0075% observed maximum mortality of H. armigera in pigeon pea. Sonune et al. (2010) observed that the indoxacarb 0.008% and lambdacyhalothrin 0.005% were the most effective in against M. vitrata in black gram. Nebapure and Sagar (2019) revealed that chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC @ 30g a.i./ ha followed by indoxacarb 15.8EC @ 73g a.i./ ha at 15 days interval were effective against M. vitrata on pigeonpea. Ahmed et al. (2020) found emamectin benzoate @ 1.0 g/ l as the most effective against M. vitrata.Haripriya et al. (2021) revealed that spinosad 45SC @ 75 ml/ ha followed by emamectin benzoate 5SG @ 200 ml/ ha were effective against M. vitrata on lablab and green gram. Thus, emamectin benzoate 5SG at 0.002%, indoxacarb 14.5SC at 0.007% and lambda-cyhalothrin 5SC at 0.005% can be recommended against H. armigera and M. vitrata.

Top

Tables

Table 1.:

Efficacy of insecticides against H. armigera on Indian bean



Tr. No.TreatmentsMean no. of H. amiigera larvae/ plantPooled
Before-sprayFirst spraySecond spray
1DAS3DAS5DAS7DAS14DAS1DAS3DAS5DAS7DAS14DAS
T1Thiamethoxam 25 WG at 0.025%2.25 (5.08)2.05 (4.20)2.12 (4.49)2.09 (4.35)1.89 (3.59)2.05 (4.20)1.89 (3.58)1.95 (3.82)1.86 (3.47)1.77 (3.13)1.70 (2.89)1.96 (3.85)
T2Thiacloprid 21.7 SC at 0.012%2.32 (5.40)1.70 (2.90)1.81 (3.27)1.75 (3.08)1.52 (2.31)1.72 (2.94)1.50 (2.24)1.58 (2.49)1.47 (2.16)1.41 (1.98)1.29 (1.66)1.60 (2.57)
T3Buprofezin 25 SC at 0.05%2.18 (4.77)2.03 (4.13)2.10 (4.42)2.07 (4.28)1.84 (3.38)2.02 (4.08)1.84 (3.39)1.90 (3.62)1.82 (3.30)1.76 (3.10)1.66 (2.76)1.92 (3.72)
T4Acetamiprid 20 SP at 0.004%2.24 (5.03)2.06 (4.26)2.12 (4.49)2.10 (4.24)1.91 (3.66)2.07 (4.28)1.91 (3.65)1.97 (3.88)1.92 (3.69)1.85 (3.43)1.72 (2.96)1.98 (3.95)
T5Indoxacarb 14.5 SC at 0.007%2.31 (5.32)1.40 (1.97)1.51 (2.28)1.41 (1.99)1.10 (1.21)1.44 (2.07)1.12 (1.25)1.25 (1.55)1.11 (1.23)1.01 (1.03)0.95 (0.90)1.26 (1.61)
T6Emamectin Benzoate 5 SG at 0.002%2.28 (5.18)1.38 (1.90)1.48 (2.20)1.36 (1.86)1.05 (1.10)1.42 (2.01)1.05 (1.10)1.19 (1.42)1.07 (1.15)0.98 (0.97)0.91 (0.83)1.23 (1.54)
T7Lambda-cyhalothrin 5 SC at 0.005%2.25 (5.06)1.43 (2.04)1.53 (2.35)1.46 (2.15)1.14 (1.31)1.47 (2.17)1.13 (1.29)1.27 (1.61)1.14 (1.29)1.04 (1.08)0.98 (0.97)1.29 (1.69)
T8Novaluron 10 EC at 0.01%2.29 (5.27)1.72 (2.98)1.83 (3.33)1.77 (3.14)1.47 (2.17)1.73 (2.99)1.51 (2.29)1.61 (2.60)1.53 (2.33)1.46 (2.13)1.35 (1.81)1.62 (2.65)
T9Control (Treated with water)2.32 (5.39)2.36 (5.60)2.49 (6.23)2.45 (6.03)2.36 (5.60)2.44 (5.97)2.33 (5.46)2.39 (5.71)2.33 (5.43)2.29 (5.23)2.26 (5.11)2.34 (5.73)
S.E.m ±0.100.090.080.090.090.090.100.090.070.090.070.02
S.E.m ± (P×T)0.03
C.D (p=0.05)NS0.260.240.260.290.270.310.260.210.270.220.06
C.D (p= 0.05) (P×T)NS

DAS = Days after spraying; Figure in parentheses original value whereas, those outside $$ transformed values.


TopBack

Table 2.:

Efficacy of insecticides against M. vitrata on Indian bean



Tr. No.TreatmentsMean no. of M. vitrata larvae/ plantYield (q/ ha)Increase in yield over control (%)
Before sprayFirst spraySecond sprayPooled
1DAS3DAS5DAS7DAS14DAS1DAS3DAS5DAS7DAS14DAS
T1Thiamethoxam 25 WG at 0.025%2.63 (6.93)2.27 (5.14)2.33 (5.44)2.30 (5.30)2.27 (5.15)2.43 (5.88)2.22 (4.91)2.26 (5.09)2.15 (4.61)2.05 (4.20)1.92 (3.69)2.24 (5.02)14.5831.23
T2Thiacloprid 21.7 SC at 0.012%2.57 (6.62)2.22 (4.91)2.27 (5.15)2.13 (4.54)1.95 (3.81)2.05 (4.21)1.77 (3.12)1.80 (3.25)1.71 (2.92)1.59 (2.52)1.46 (2.13)1.92 (3.68)17.1254.09
T3Buprofezin 25 SC at0.05%2.67 (7.13)2.26 (5.12)2.31 (5.36)2.29 (5.23)2.25 (5.09)2.42 (5.84)2.19 (4.78)2.22 (4.94)2.13 (4.54)2.03 (4.13)1.90 (3.60)2.22 (4.94)15.0435.37
T4Acetamiprid 20 SP at 0.004%2.63 (6.92)2.28 (5.20)2.36 (5.58)2.32 (5.38)2.28 (5.22)2.44 (5.97)2.23 (4.99)2.28 (5.21)2.19 (4.81)2.10 (4.41)1.94 (3.75)2.26 (5.13)13.6522.86
T5Indoxacarb 14.5 SC at 0.007%2.57 (6.59)1.81 (3.26)1.84 (3.37)1.67 (2.80)1.58 (2.48)1.70 (2.87)1.36 (1.84)1.39 (1.94)1.27 (1.60)1.16 (1.34)1.07 (1.15)1.51 (2.29)20.6085.41
T6Emamectin Benzoate 5 SG at 0.002%2.51 (6.28)1.80 (3.23)1.82 (3.31)1.64 (2.69)1.52 (2.32)1.64 (2.70)1.28 (1.63)1.36 (1.85)1.24 (1.53)1.13 (1.27)1.00 (1.01)1.47 (2.17)21.7595.76
T7Lambda-cyhalothrin 5 SC at 0.005%2.62 (6.88)1.82 (3.33)1.85 (3.42)1.69 (2.87)1.60 (2.56)1.72 (2.95)1.38 (1.91)1.42 (2.02)1.29 (1.67)1.18 (1.40)1.10 (1.21)1.53 (2.36)19.8178.30
T8Novaluron 10 EC at 0.01%2.48 (6.16)2.25 (5.06)2.27 (5.17)2.16 (4.66)1.98 (3.93)2.08 (4.35)1.80 (3.24)1.83 (3.34)1.74 (3.02)1.61 (2.60)1.48 (2.19)1.94 (3.78)17.5958.32
T9Control (Treated with water)2.51 (6.32)2.67 (7.12)2.72 (7.42)2.71 (7.34)2.70 (7.29)2.77 (7.69)2.62 (6.88)2.69 (7.22)2.65 (7.02)2.60 (6.76)2.64 (6.97)2.69 (7.26)11.11
S.E.m ±0.130.120.120.120.090.100.120.110.110.120.100.080.98
S.E.m ± (P×T)0.04
C.D (p=0.05)NS0.370.360.380.290.310.350.330.340.360.310.252.95
C.D (p= 0.05) (P×T)0.12

DAS = Days after spraying; Figure in parentheses original value whereas, those outside $$ transformed values.

TopBack

References

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

 
║ Site map ║ Privacy Policy ║ Copyright ║ Terms & Conditions ║ Page Rank Tool
747,800,280 visitor(s) since 30th May, 2005.
All rights reserved. Site designed and maintained by DIVA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD..
Note: Please use Internet Explorer (6.0 or above). Some functionalities may not work in other browsers.