(3.15.3.154)
Users online: 11904     
Ijournet
Email id
 

Year : 2023, Volume : 85, Issue : 4
First page : ( 898) Last page : ( 902)
Print ISSN : 0367-8288. Online ISSN : 0974-8172. Published online : 2023 December 04.
Article DOI : 10.55446/IJE.2022.1515

Competitive Regulation of Dominant Exotic Whiteflies on Coconut Palms as Influenced by Biotic and Abiotic Factors

Logeshkumar P1,*, Nalini R1, Josephrajkumar A2, Chandramani P1, Mini M L1, Singh R Durai1, Murugan M3, Suresh K1

1Department of Agricultural Entomology, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Madurai, 625104, Tamil Nadu, India

2ICAR-CPCRI, Central Plantation Crop Research Institute, Regional Station, Kayamkulam690533, Kerala, India

3Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore641003, Tamil Nadu, India

*Email: logeshkumar.raj@gmail.com (corresponding author): ORCID ID 0009-0009-1600-4309

Online Published on 04 January, 2024.

Received:  April,  2023; :  July,  2023; Accepted:  July,  2023; :  July,  2023.

Abstract

In the recent past, exotic whiteflies viz., Aleurodicus rugioperculatus, Paraleyrodes bondari, Paraleyrodes minei and Aleurotrachelus atratus are infesting coconut plantations in India. Based on the damage potential, the predominant species are the rugose spiralling whitefly, A. rugioperculatus and the Bondars nesting whitefly, P. bondari. A study was undertaken to determine the seasonal incidence and population dynamics of these in the new invasion region at Karungalakudi block of Madurai district from 33rd standard meteorological week (SMW) of 2021 to 32nd SMW of 2022. The results indicated that A. rugioperculatus incidence rose considerably from the first week of April (10.9 adults/ leaflet) to third week of May (8.3 adults/ leaflet; while P. bondari reached maximum during the third week of March (71.99 adults/ leaflet) and extended up to first week of June (67.57 adults/ leaflet) coinciding with summer months with high temperature and limited precipitation. Subsequently, their incidence declined with the onset of north east monsoon coupled with parasitism by Encarsia guadeloupae and predation by chrysopids from third-week of August to fourth-week of December in 2021. The extent of parasitism by E. guadeloupae on A. rugioperculatus nymphs was positively correlated and ranged from 40% (third week of August, 33rd SMW, 2021) to 84% (second week of June 2022, 24th SMW). Chrysopids revealed a highly significant positive correlation with the incidence.

Top

Keywords

Aleurodicus rugioperculatusParaleyrodes bondari, Invasive whiteflies; weather factors, Parasitism, Predation, Encarsia guadeloupae, Green lacewings.

Top

 

Currently, many species of exotic whiteflies have invaded and caused heavy damage to coconut plantations in India. During 2016-2019, four non-native whiteflies namely rugose spiralling whitefly (Aleurodicus rugioperculatus Martin) (Shanas et al., 2016; Selvaraj et al., 2016; Srinivasan et al., 2016); Bondars nesting whitefly (Paraleyrodes bondari Peracchi) (Josephrajkumar et al., 2019); Neotropical nesting whitefly (P. minei Iaccarino) (Chandrika Mohan et al., 2019) and Neotropical palm whitefly (Aleurotrachelus atratus Hempel) (Selvaraj et al., 2019; Josephrajkumar et al., 2020) were predominantly observed on coconut palms in southern states of Tamil Nadu. Climax modeling was performed for A. rugioperculatus to predict its invasiveness and the damage inflicting zones which included coastal regions of Maharashtra, Karnataka, Goa, parts of Kerala extending up to Gujarat border. In south India, Karnataka (Bengaluru, Mysuru, Tumakuru, Hassan, Belagavi, Shikaripura and Birur) and Tamil Nadu (Coimbatore) had favourable weather conditions to expand the invasive potential of the pest (Chakravarthy et al., 2017).

MaxEnt studies further revealed that Eastern coastal parts of Tamil Nadu, North-Eastern parts of Andhra Pradesh, Eastern coastal belts of Odisha, north-western coastal belts of Kerala, south-western coastal parts of Karnataka and western coastal belts of Maharashtra and Gujarat were predicted for highest habitat suitability regions for A. rugioperculatus (Selvaraj et al., 2022). Maruthadurai et al. (2023) also highlighted MaxEnt model that forecasted a possible A. rugioperculatus distribution with the yearly mean temperature (Bio 1, 28.9%), mean diurnal range (Bio 2, 19.5%) and annual precipitation (Bio 12, 19.1). India’s coastal and southern states were found as the most ideal places for A. rugioperculatus establishment. Though, A. rugioperculatus sustained well in hot humid weather, the tropics, subtropics and temperate zones were found as the best places to proliferate and invade. In Kerala, deficit in south-west monsoon during 2016 increased the A. rugioperculatus population whereas subsequent heavy rains subdued the whitefly population. Furthermore, increase in the temperature up to 2°C was found as a pre-disposing factor and 7% decline in the relative humidity favoured the A. rugioperculatus population (Chandrika Mohan et al., 2016). As the invasion of A. rugioperculatus and P. bondari is relatively new to the Indian lands there is a need to understand the pestiferous nature of these exotic whiteflies in relation to the biotic (parasitoids and predators) as well as abiotic factors (temperature, rainfall and relative humidity). In this research paper the population dynamics of these whiteflies as influenced by biotic and abiotic factors were observed and presented.

Top

Materials and Methods

The population variation and seasonal modulation of A. rugioperculatus and P. bondari were studied in Karungalakudi block of Madurai district, Tamil Nadu on four-year-old highly susceptible Dwarf x Tall coconut trees. Surveillance was done at weekly interval for a year starting from August 2021 to August 2022, which coincided with 33rd standard meteorological week (SMW) of 2021 to 32nd SMW of 2022. Ten coconut trees were randomly selected. In each selected tree, five mature bottom fronds were chosen in which five leaflets were marked to collect data on the population dynamics of A. rugioperculatus and P. bondari. Number of nymphs and adult whiteflies were recorded on the selected leaflet and inter-related with weather factors. The coconut trees were maintained in pesticide-free environment as well as the trees were supplied with recommended dose of macronutrients, micronutrients and irrigation as per recommended package of practices. The correlation studies of exotic whiteflies population with biotic and abiotic factors was taken up. Biotic factors included natural parasitism of A. rugioperculatus by Encarsia guadeloupae (X1), predation by chrysopids (X2), coccinellids (X3) and spiders (X4) while the abiotic factors included were maximum temperature (X5), minimum temperature (X6), minimum relative humidity (X7), maximum relative humidity(X8) and rainfall (X8). In case of P. bondari, excluding the parasitoid (X1) all other factors were observed and correlated. The weather parameters were collected from the Google earth engine software (Satellite derived data). Multiple regression analysis was also performed for A. rugioperculatus and P. bondari relationship with predators, parasitoid and weather parameters. Using the SPSS 16.0 statistical software, simple correlation and multiple regression analyses were done between both dependent and independent variables to know the significant relationship.

Top

Results and Discussion

The population of exotic whiteflies on coconut was maximum during summer season i.e., March, 2022 to April, 2022. A. rugioperculatus population was high from fourth week of April, 2022 (10.9 adults/ leaflet) concurred with 12th SMW of 2022. Later, A. rugioperculatus population was moderate throughout the study period and it ranged from 5.4 to 10.9 adults/ leaflet. P. bondari was found maximum from third week of March, 2022 (71.99 adults/leaflet) to second week of June, 2022 (67.49 adults/ leaflet) and coincided with 11th to 23rd SMW of 2022. Among these two exotic whiteflies, the population of P. bondari was seven-fold higher when compared to A. rugioperculatus (Fig. 1). Similar results were observed in Kerala where P. bondari increased to four-fold with less numbers of A. rugioperculatus during July, 2020 (CPCRI, 2020). Further no two species cannot exist in the same limiting ecosystem and our study clearly states the increasing phase of P. bondari and receding phase of A. rugioperculatus due to higher parasitism rates of E. guadeloupae as reported by Chandrika Mohan et al. (2019). Chavan et al. (2022) reported peak population of A. rugioperculatus during 9th April to 15th April, whereas, Elango and Jeyarajan Nelson (2020) reported maximum population during July. Maximum temperature showed a strong positive correlation for both A. rugioperculatus (r=0.495**) and P. bondari (r=0.774**) population. Maximum A. rugioperculatus population was noticed during first week of April, 2022 when the maximum temperature prevailed at 36.2°C whereas P. bondari was highest during third week of March when the temperature was 36.0°C on 11th SMW. With regard to the minimum temperature, A. rugioperculatus population had a non-significant correlation (r=0.010), whereas it was positively correlated (r = 0.458**) for P. bondari (Table 1). Mane (2019) revealed a positive correlation between A. rugioperculatus and maximum temperature. Similarly, maximum temperature and relative humidity had positive correlation for cotton whitefly (Ahmad et al., 2018).

Both A. rugioperculatus and P. bondari population with maximum relative humidity had a highly significant negative correlation of r = -0.518**** and r = -0.825** respectively. Similarly, Elango and Jeyarajan Nelson (2020) reported the negative correlation between relative humidity and whitefly populations. Rainfall had a negative correlation (r = -0.394**) with A. rugioperculatus population (Table 1), whereas during northeast monsoon period the population of P. bondari was very low (Fig. 2), 1.50 adults/leaflet (46th SMW, fourth week of November, 2021). According to Ranjith et al. (1996), in Kerala A. dispersus rebounded throughout the summer and dropped off after severe pre-monsoon showers. Among the abiotic factors, rainfall was the predominant factor which helped in the reduction of A. rugioperculatus population.

The aphelinid parasitoid Encarsia guadeloupae had a positive correlation (r = 0.328*) with A.rugioperculatus population which helped in regulating the population of A. rugioperculatus (Table 1). The activity of E. guadeloupae coincided with the occurrence of A. rugioperculatus all through and the highest parasitism of 84% on nymphal stage was recorded in 24th SMW of June, 2022 and the lowest parasitism of 40% was recorded during 33rd SMW of August, 2021. Mani and Krishnamoorthy (2000) reported nearly 95.68% parasitism by E. guadeloupae on Aleurodicus dispersus which is in line with our study, thus it could be a probable reason for low population density of A. rugioperculatus compared to P. bondari. Among the chrysopids, Mallada sp. was found throughout the study period feeding on the immature stages of A. rugioperculatus as well as P. bondari and its population ranged from 1 to 4 grubs/ frond. Chrysopid population had a highly significant positive correlation with both the whiteflies population i.e., A. rugioperculatus (r = 0.699**) and P. bondari (r = 0.759**) (Table 1). The P. bondari population alone had positive correlation (r=0.366**) with predatory colepterans (Table 1). The ladybird beetles observed were Cryptoleamus montrouzieri and Scymnus coccivora along with predatory cybocephalid beetles. Ballal et al. (2021) reported a positive link of coccinellid predator larvae with adults and the immature stages of Aleurotrachelus trachoides (Back). Furthermore, spider population had a positive correlation (r = 0.437**) with A. rugioperculatus population besides it was not significant for P. bondari population (Table 1). Naik et al. (2009) stated a major positive connection between whitefly, coccinellids and spiders populations in brinjal crop and alike to our findings. The coefficient of determination (R2) between A. rugioperculatus and the parasitoid was found to be 74.4% of total variation (Fig. 1), whereas for the abiotic factors it was found as 0.02. Thus, it is clear that A. rugioperculatus population was suppressed only by E. guadeloupae. In case of P. bondari the total variation was 74.73 for abiotic factors in population regulation (Fig. 2).

The fixed plot analysis on the exotic coconut whiteflies revealed that A. rugioperculatus was very minimal throughout the study when compared to Bondars nesting whitefly, due to the higher rates of parasitism by Encarsia guadeloupae. High temperature favoured whitefly outbreak as observed in high numbers during the summer months. Rainfall drastically reduced the population of both the whiteflies. Thus, weather factors and parasitism by E. guadeloupae played a critical role in the population regulation of A. rugioperculatus in the surveyed area. Innundative release of Apertochrysa sp. is advised in coconut plantations to suppress pest outbreak. The farmers are advised a pesticide holiday approach as well as to release the predators during the months of April and May so as to reduce the flaring whitefly population. Adoption of conservation biological control program helps in reducing the cost of plant protection for the coconut growers and safeguard the environment as well.

Top

Figures

Fig. 1.:

Population dynamics of A. rugioperculatus and P. bondari and its natural enemies




TopBack

Fig. 2.:

Seasonal incidence A. rugioperculatus and P. bondari



TopBack

Table

Table 1.:

Popultion dynamics of A. rugioperculatus and P bondari



AdultParasitoidChrysopidCoccinellids/CybocephalidsSpidersMax. temp.Min. tempMin. RHMax. RHRainfall
YX1X2X3X4X5X6X7X8X9
Biotic FactorsAbiotic factors
A. rugioperculatus
YAdult10.328*0.699**0.1620.437**0.495**0.010-0.508**-0.518**-0.394**
X1Parasitoid10.442**0.285*0.2490.385**0.230-0.382**-0.418**-0.101
X2Chrysopid10.372**0.1820.571**0.202-0.623**-0.614**-0.364**
X3Coccinellids/Cybocephalids1-0.0360.298*0.157-0.347*-0.315*-0.314*
X4Spiders10.144-0.142-0.089-0.1660.051
X5Max. temp.10.724**-0.833**-0.904**-0.287*
X6Min. Temp.1-0.364**-0.546**0.172
X7Min. RH10.940**0.542**
X8Max. RH10.379**
X9Rainfall1
P. bondari
AdultChrysopidCoccinellids/CybocephalidsSpidersMax. temp.Min. tempMin. RHMax. RHRainfall
X1X2X3X4X5X6X7X8
Biotic factorsAbiotic factors
YAdult10.759**0.366**0.246NS0.774**0.458**-0.785**-0.825**-0.362**
X2Chrysopid10.372**0.182NS0.558**0.202NS-0.623**-0.614**-0.364**
X3Coccinellids/ Cybocephalids1-0.036NS0.293*0.157NS-0.347*-0.315*-0.314*
X4Spiders10.144-0.142NS-0.089NS-0.166NS0.051
X5Max. temp10.724**-0.830**-0.901**-0.281*
X6Min. temp1-0.364**-0.546**0. 172
X7Min. RH10.940**0.542**
X8Max. RH10.379**
X9Rainfall1

significant at p=0.05;

at p=0.01

TopBack

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Department of Agricultural Entomology, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Madurai for providing facilities and technical support.

Top

References

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

 
║ Site map ║ Privacy Policy ║ Copyright ║ Terms & Conditions ║ Page Rank Tool
748,888,516 visitor(s) since 30th May, 2005.
All rights reserved. Site designed and maintained by DIVA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD..
Note: Please use Internet Explorer (6.0 or above). Some functionalities may not work in other browsers.