(3.135.219.78)
Users online: 15195     
Ijournet
Email id
 

Year : 2023, Volume : 85, Issue : 3
First page : ( 651) Last page : ( 653)
Print ISSN : 0367-8288. Online ISSN : 0974-8172. Published online : 2023  18.
Article DOI : 10.55446/IJE.2023.1518

Efficacy of Biopesticides and Chlorantraniliprole against Tomato Fruit Borer Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)

Kushal Challagurgula1,*, Kumar Ashwani1

1Department of Entomology, Naini Institute of Agriculture, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj211007, Uttar Pradesh, India

*Email: kushalch1999@gmail.com (corresponding author): ORCID ID 0009-0006-3192-6510

Online Published on 18 October, 2023.

Abstract

Field trial was conducted at the Central Research Farm, during rabi, 2022-2023. The experiment was laid out in RBD (randomized block design). Eight treatments were evaluated against Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner). Insecticides with treatment T1 chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SC (1:10.) was the best. This was chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SC, ½ dose chlorantraniliprole + nisco sixer plus 2ml/ l (O. sanctum 13%+ A. nardus 4%), spinosad 45%SC, nisco sixer plus 2ml/ l (O. sanctum 13%+ A. nardus 4%) recorded the least fruit infestation. The highest yield was noticed in chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SC (240.5 q/ ha), followed by ½ dose chlorantraniliprole + nisco sixer plus 2ml/ l (O. sanctum 13%+ A. nardus 4%).

Top

Keywords

Chlorantraniliprole, Cost benefit ratio, Helicoverpa armigera, Incidence, Spinosad, Tomato, Treatments, Spinosad, NSKE, Azadirachtin, Nisco sixer plus, Ocimum, Fruit infestation.

Top

 
║ Site map ║ Privacy Policy ║ Copyright ║ Terms & Conditions ║ Page Rank Tool
749,042,705 visitor(s) since 30th May, 2005.
All rights reserved. Site designed and maintained by DIVA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD..
Note: Please use Internet Explorer (6.0 or above). Some functionalities may not work in other browsers.