Identification of sensitive parameters and uncertainty analysis for simulating streamflow in Jaraikela catchment of Brahmani river basin using SWAT model Padhiary Jagadish1, Das Dwarika Mohan2,*, Patra K.C.1, Sahoo B.C.2, Panigrahi B.2 1Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela 2College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar *Corresponding author: E-mail: dwarika.dmd@gmail.com (Dwarika Mohan Das)
Online published on 9 April, 2020. Abstract The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) is a widely accepted semi-distributed model for watershed hydrological analysis. The facility of uncertainty analysis with the help of SWAT-Calibration and Uncertainty Procedures (SWAT-CUP) model is now capable to bring a variety of calibration and analysis techniques in one single platform, namely ParaSol, sequential uncertainty fitting (SUFI-2), Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE), particle swarm optimization and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC). In the present study, the SWAT model has been calibrated for the period 1987–2000 considering initial 3 years as the warm-up period (1987–89) and validated from 2001–2010 for monthly streamflow simulation. Uncertainty analysis was carried out using SUFI-2 algorithm at Jaraikela gauging station of Bramhani river basin, India. The sensitivity of the parameters was determined according to the t-stat and p-value. Nine distinguished parameters were selected for sensitivity analyses. The performance of the model was evaluated satisfactorily on monthly time scale streamflow simulation using Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), the coefficient of determination (R2) and Percentage BIAS (PBIAS). The P and R factors were used to assess the degree of uncertainty. The values of NSE, R2, and PBIAS were found to be 0.84, 0.85 and-0.08 during the calibration period and 0.71, 0.73 and-0.17 during the validation period, respectively. The values of P and R factors were observed to be 0.79 and 0.92, respectively during calibration, and 0.89 and 0.86 during the validation period, respectively. The simulated streamflow also well fitted within the 95 percentage prediction uncertainty (95PPU) band of SUFI-2 algorithm during the calibration and validation periods indicating a satisfactory performance of the model under parameter uncertainty. Top Keywords Sensitivity parameter SUFI-2 SWAT Streamflow Uncertainty analysis. Top |